The Calcutta High Court has instructed the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) to reassess its decision to immediately demolish three rooftop restaurants in the city.
The court’s direction follows an appeal from the owners of the establishments, who challenged the legality of the KMC’s demolition orders under the KMC Act, 1980. In a significant ruling, the court has asked KMC to determine whether there exists a “grave emergency” that justifies immediate demolition, or if the petitioners should first be given an opportunity for a hearing regarding the alleged unauthorized constructions. The case revolves around three rooftop restaurants that received notices from KMC, directing them to cease operations and demolish their unauthorized constructions. If the restaurant owners failed to comply, the KMC threatened to initiate coercive demolition actions. The petitioners have raised concerns about the legality of these notices, particularly questioning the power of KMC to issue such orders without first providing a hearing.
The petitioners argue that they were not afforded the opportunity for a hearing prior to the notice being issued and claim that the immediate cessation of operations would have a devastating impact on their livelihoods. They maintain that all necessary permissions and licenses had been obtained for their businesses, and they believe that the KMC’s actions are unwarranted. The KMC, on the other hand, defends its position by citing the violation of building rules that compromise public safety. According to the corporation, the rooftop constructions in question do not adhere to the KMC Building Rules, 2009. Specifically, these unauthorized structures obstruct critical fire exit routes, creating serious safety risks for the public. The KMC has argued that the provisions of the KMC Act, including Section 401, empower the Municipal Commissioner to issue stop-work notices when such violations are identified. In this instance, the KMC maintains that immediate action was necessary to safeguard public safety and that further measures under Section 400 (8) of the Act were justified in light of the serious violations.
As the matter was brought before the High Court, the bench, led by Justice Gaurang Kanth, took a measured approach. The court ordered KMC to re-evaluate the situation, focusing on whether an imminent threat to public safety exists that would justify immediate demolition. The court made it clear that only if the KMC concludes that a grave emergency warrants swift action, should demolition proceed. In the absence of such a determination, the petitioners should be granted an opportunity to present their case. In its ruling, the court emphasized the importance of a balanced approach, one that upholds public safety while also considering the interests of the business owners. The petitioners’ claims that they have adhered to legal requirements and obtained necessary licenses were noted by the court, which acknowledged the potential harm to the business community if the KMC’s actions were carried out without due process.
The court also highlighted that in cases where no immediate danger to public safety is evident, KMC should first provide a formal opportunity for a hearing. This ensures that the restaurant owners have the chance to present their side of the story and provide any evidence that may counter the KMC’s claims. The court further instructed that the notice under Section 401 of the KMC Act be kept in abeyance until a final decision is reached after re-verification. The court’s ruling carries significant implications for urban planning and business regulations in Kolkata. It underscores the need for municipalities to exercise their authority judiciously, balancing enforcement of building codes with the rights and livelihoods of business owners. In an era where cities are becoming increasingly congested, with rooftop spaces being utilized for commercial purposes, the issue of unauthorized constructions is a common one. However, it is equally important for municipal authorities to ensure that they follow legal procedures and engage with stakeholders before taking drastic actions such as demolition.
Experts in urban development and building regulations have pointed out that the case is a reflection of the ongoing challenges faced by municipal bodies in managing the rapid growth of cities like Kolkata. With increasing pressure to provide more spaces for commercial activities in dense urban areas, the temptation to bypass regulatory measures often leads to conflicts such as the one currently being addressed by the Calcutta High Court. The court’s decision to remand the case back to the KMC is seen as a step towards ensuring that any future action taken by the corporation is not only legally sound but also fair to the affected parties. While the public safety concerns raised by the KMC cannot be disregarded, the importance of due process in matters involving property rights and livelihoods cannot be overstated. The ruling reflects the broader tension between urban development and the need for regulatory oversight in fast-growing cities.
The court also placed restrictions on the restaurant owners during the pendency of the proceedings, prohibiting them from continuing any activities at the disputed sites. To prevent any unauthorized actions, the police stations in the area were directed to maintain strict surveillance over the properties to ensure that no third-party rights were created or activities undertaken during the legal process. This case highlights the broader issue of unauthorized constructions in urban spaces, which often become a point of contention between municipal authorities and business owners. As cities expand and evolve, there is a growing need for robust mechanisms to address such issues, while ensuring that both public safety and business interests are considered.
The High Court’s decision is also likely to have broader implications for other cities across India, where unauthorized constructions remain a significant concern. Urban planners and local authorities will be closely watching how the KMC handles this issue moving forward, as it may set a precedent for similar cases in the future. While the matter is still under consideration, the legal proceedings serve as a reminder of the importance of balancing development and regulation in modern urban environments. The evolving case in Kolkata underscores the need for authorities to carefully consider the broader implications of their actions, particularly when they have the potential to disrupt businesses and livelihoods.
Also Read : Kolkatas Rs 581 Million Sewer Overhaul to Combat Waterlogging
