Dehradun is once again in the spotlight for what could become yet another cautionary tale of development without sustainability.
The proposed ₹6,200 crore elevated road between Dehradun and Mussoorie, aimed at cutting travel time for tourists from Delhi-NCR, is drawing increasing scrutiny for its potential environmental and human cost. Despite past catastrophes in the state—including the Kedarnath floods, the Rishiganga glacier burst, the subsidence crisis in Joshimath, and the Silkyara tunnel incident—Uttarakhand appears to be repeating the same pattern: fast-tracked infrastructure projects that overlook the fragility of the Himalayan ecosystem and the socio-economic consequences for the local population.
The plan involves constructing a 26-km elevated road corridor from the foothills of Dehradun to the popular tourist town of Mussoorie. However, key aspects remain unclear: the precise source of funding, execution agency, and the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process. More critically, the project may displace as many as 2,614 families—averaging nearly one family every 10 metres along the route—with no formalised rehabilitation or land-for-land compensation policy in place. Officials have yet to issue the mandatory Section 4 notification under land acquisition laws, nor has a comprehensive land bank been prepared to accommodate displaced residents. With neither detailed resettlement plans nor designated alternative plots, affected communities are being left in limbo.
Beyond human displacement, the ecological footprint of the project is expected to be substantial. Over 3,000 trees are likely to be felled along the proposed stretch. Forest clearance, land levelling, and large-scale construction activity in the already fragile Doon Valley are expected to aggravate landslides, alter water flow patterns, and endanger local biodiversity. Ironically, while the government promotes the project on the basis of reducing travel time, current travel from Delhi to Mussoorie already takes approximately 7 to 8 hours—without the expressways being fully operational. Even with the new elevated corridor, the gain might be a mere 30 to 45 minutes, which seems hardly justifiable when weighed against the project’s massive environmental and social toll.
The argument that the elevated road will reduce congestion falls flat when evaluated against Mussoorie’s limited capacity. The hill town currently accommodates only about 2,000 cars and 1,500–2,000 two-wheelers. On summer weekends, traffic inflow often crosses 5,000 vehicles, leading to long, frustrating jams. The new road could double this figure, worsening the very traffic issue it claims to resolve. Meanwhile, the Dehradun–Mussoorie ropeway project—a ₹300 crore initiative already under execution—offers a greener, more efficient solution. It promises to cut travel time, eliminate vehicular emissions, and offer an experiential journey for tourists. Most importantly, it requires far less ecological interference compared to building an elevated expressway through forested terrain.
The elevated road plan seems to prioritise profit-driven contract awards and tourist influx over long-term sustainability and local welfare. Critics argue that a more rational approach would be to invest in alternative destinations across the region, decentralising tourist pressure and creating balanced growth. Developing a new eco-tourism town with ₹6,200 crore could potentially achieve far more in terms of employment, ecological preservation, and regional development. At a time when climate change is intensifying across the subcontinent, the need for resilient infrastructure planning has never been more urgent. The Himalayan belt, particularly Uttarakhand, requires context-sensitive development rooted in environmental balance, not cement-and-steel shortcuts.
Also Read :Delhi CM Reviews Rs 35000 Crore NHAI Projects
