Mumbai is expanding the use of digital identification for community dogs as the civic administration strengthens its wider rabies-control programme. QR-enabled reflective collars are being used to connect individual dogs with records covering vaccination, sterilisation and health information. The move could give field teams a more reliable way to monitor interventions, while helping Mumbai build the data infrastructure needed for sustained disease surveillance. The technology is intended to address a practical weakness in conventional vaccination drives: physical markings can disappear, making it difficult to establish whether a dog has already received treatment. A scannable identifier can instead connect the animal to a digital record that can be updated after subsequent veterinary interventions.
However, the Mumbai dog tracking system is not entirely new. BMC had already used QR-linked collars in a pilot around Mumbai airport in 2024, alongside anti-rabies vaccination and sterilisation. The civic veterinary department’s own records describe QR collars as a way to provide information on vaccination status and contacts associated with dogs in the area. The latest push comes as Mumbai works towards its 2030 rabies-elimination target. BMC has reported that more than 100,000 dogs were vaccinated between 2023 and 2025, while its wider programme includes surveillance and sterilisation. In July 2026, the corporation also entered a three-year arrangement with Mission Rabies India covering mass vaccination, surveillance and public awareness through 2028. For urban management, the value of Mumbai dog tracking will depend less on the QR code itself and more on the quality of the database behind it. Records need to remain current when animals are vaccinated, sterilised, treated or relocated. Veterinary teams, civic officials and animal-welfare groups would also need compatible processes to prevent duplicate entries and ensure that information collected in the field is consistently uploaded.
There is a citizen-safety dimension as well. Reliable vaccination records can help field workers distinguish between dogs that have received anti-rabies treatment and those requiring intervention. That can improve the targeting of limited veterinary resources while reducing unnecessary handling of animals that have already been treated. The collars also introduce a modest road-safety benefit if their reflective surfaces improve visibility after dark. Yet technology cannot substitute for systematic vaccination coverage, sterilisation, responsible waste management and rapid response to suspected rabies cases. Mumbai’s large community-dog population makes those measures interconnected rather than standalone interventions.
The next test will be scale and governance. If the digital registry remains accurate, accessible to authorised field teams and regularly audited, QR identification could become useful civic infrastructure rather than another short-lived tagging exercise. For residents and animals alike, its success will ultimately be measured by better disease control, safer streets and more accountable urban animal management.