In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has mandated that no further trees may be felled for the Metro Railway project in Kolkata without prior approval from the Central Empowered Committee (CEC). This decision came in response to an appeal from the environmental advocacy group, People United for Better Living, which challenged the Calcutta High Court’s earlier ruling allowing the project to proceed. The apex court’s ruling underscores the delicate balance between urban development and environmental preservation, particularly in a city that has seen considerable ecological degradation.
The project in question entails a new Metro line stretching 16.7 km between Joka and Majerhat. According to the petitioners, the Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL) has already felled over 923 trees, disregarding their ecological and historical significance. The Solicitor General, representing the Union government, argued that the Metro project serves as a crucial transportation lifeline for Kolkata and asserted that transplantation efforts are in place. However, critics remain sceptical about the efficacy of tree transplantation, citing studies that suggest low survival rates for relocated trees.
The Supreme Court’s decision comes at a time when urban areas are grappling with the pressing need for sustainable development amid rampant deforestation. The bench’s order not only protects the remaining trees but also highlights the necessity for a comprehensive review of the project’s environmental impact. The court emphasized the importance of obtaining consent from the CEC to ensure that developmental projects adhere to ecological regulations. The ruling represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue about urbanisation and environmental sustainability in India.
This case exemplifies the urgent need for policymakers to reconcile developmental goals with environmental conservation. As cities like Kolkata continue to expand, it is crucial to adopt a more sustainable approach to urban planning that prioritises green spaces. The Supreme Court’s decision could serve as a precedent for future projects, ensuring that the voices of environmental advocates are heard in the face of urban development pressures. With the looming spectre of climate change, this ruling is not just about trees but also about the broader implications for the urban environment and the well-being of future generations.
