The Supreme Court has raised serious concerns over the functioning of real estate regulatory authorities (RERAs) across India, observing that the institutions are largely failing the homebuyers they were designed to protect. In hearings concerning Himachal Pradesh’s RERA, the apex court noted that the regulatory framework appears to favour defaulting developers rather than delivering timely relief to affected citizens, signalling the need for a national reassessment of state-level implementation.
The observations came while the court considered a petition by the Himachal Pradesh government seeking permission to relocate its RERA office from Shimla to Dharamshala. The move, officials said, aims to decongest Shimla and align administrative resources with evolving urban development priorities. The Supreme Court granted provisional approval for the shift, noting that the final order would depend on outcomes of ongoing proceedings in the state high court. Senior judicial authorities expressed concern over the broader operational model of RERA offices. They highlighted that retired bureaucrats currently heading many state authorities may lack the specialised skills in urban planning, sustainable development, and environmental considerations needed to manage the growing complexity of real estate projects. “The citizens for whom these authorities were established are left disappointed, while the system appears to primarily support non-compliant developers,” a bench observation indicated.
The apex court’s scrutiny comes amid widespread criticism that many RERA bodies have not effectively addressed delays in project delivery, disputed approvals, and enforcement of builder obligations. Experts suggest that this gap undermines confidence in regulatory oversight, slows housing sector accountability, and may discourage environmentally and socially responsible urban development. Urban planners emphasise that effective RERA implementation is critical to ensuring equitable access to housing, particularly in regions undergoing rapid expansion like Dharamshala and Palampur. From an administrative perspective, the Himachal Pradesh government cited policy considerations in decentralising RERA offices, pointing to development initiatives in emerging towns. The court noted that relocation of appellate powers from Shimla to Dharamshala could improve accessibility for citizens seeking redress, without undermining regulatory oversight of high-activity districts such as Shimla, Solan, Parwanoo, and Sirmaur.
Industry observers argue that the Supreme Court’s comments could trigger a broader review of RERA structures nationwide. Real estate experts suggest integrating professionals with environmental and architectural expertise, digitised complaint management, and stronger compliance enforcement to enhance responsiveness and protect homebuyer interests. As states consider reforms, the judiciary’s intervention underscores the delicate balance between decentralising administrative functions and maintaining regulatory efficacy. Strengthening RERA bodies, aligning them with sustainable urban planning goals, and prioritising citizen-centric operations remain key challenges for India’s housing governance framework.
SC Highlights RERA Inaction Undermining Urban Housing Governance Framework
