Mumbai’s unrelenting march towards urbanisation has often come at the expense of its vital green cover, a trade-off that is now under judicial scrutiny. In a landmark move, the Bombay High Court has stepped in to address this ecological imbalance by proposing the formation of a high-powered committee to regulate the felling of trees for infrastructure projects. This proactive stance by the judiciary signals a growing recognition that unchecked development and environmental sustainability are not mutually exclusive but must be harmoniously balanced to create a truly zero-net-carbon and equitable city. The court’s suggestion represents a crucial intervention, aiming to establish a transparent and robust mechanism to protect the city’s shrinking natural assets.
The proposed committee, as envisioned by the court, would be a multi-disciplinary body comprising retired judges, representatives from credible social organisations, and environmental department officials. Its primary mandate would be to review development proposals that involve large-scale tree-cutting and, crucially, to suggest less damaging alternatives. By embedding the committee’s recommendations into the early stages of project design, the court aims to pre-emptively mitigate ecological damage rather than merely responding to it after the fact. This structural shift from a reactive to a proactive approach is pivotal for a city where green cover continues to face immense pressure. It ensures that the environmental cost of development is factored into planning from the very beginning, paving the way for more sustainable and thoughtful urban expansion.
Environmental experts and advocates have hailed the court’s suggestion as a watershed moment. For years, they have argued that existing regulatory frameworks are often inadequate, with trees being sacrificed for projects without sufficient consideration for alternatives. The proposed committee, with its diverse expertise and judicial oversight, could provide a much-needed check on this process. By including representatives of social organisations, the court also ensures that the voices of the community and civil society are heard, fostering a more democratic and participatory approach to urban governance. This move aligns with the larger global agenda of creating gender-neutral and equitable cities, as a greener, healthier environment benefits all residents, particularly those who lack the resources to mitigate the impacts of pollution and environmental degradation.
While the court has sought a detailed response from the state government on the feasibility and structure of the committee, the suggestion itself is a powerful statement. It signals that development at all costs is no longer an acceptable model and that urban progress must be measured not just in concrete and steel but also in clean air and green spaces. The court’s emphasis on exploring alternatives for tree felling encourages a more innovative and creative approach to infrastructure planning. It prompts planners to consider solutions that protect the existing ecology, such as micro-tunnelling or re-routing projects, thereby minimising environmental footprints and setting a precedent for responsible urban development.
The outcome of this judicial intervention will be keenly watched. Should the state government agree to form the committee, it would set a precedent not just for Mumbai but for other Indian cities grappling with similar challenges. It is a vital step towards ensuring that the city’s growth is not a zero-sum game but a collective effort to build a metropolis that is both economically vibrant and ecologically sound. This would ultimately lead to a more sustainable, equitable, and liveable city for present and future generations.
Also Read :Supreme Court Directs Telangana to Restore 400 Acres of Kancha Gachibowli Forest
