The Madras High Court has issued notices to Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) alleging the demolition of bus shelters and footpaths during metro construction projects.
The PIL, filed by S Devadoss Gandhi Wilson of Valasaravakkam, argues that the removal of these critical infrastructures has left commuters and pedestrians in dire straits. The petition was taken up by a vacation bench comprising Justice P T Asha and Justice N Senthilkumar, who have directed CMRL, the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC), the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC), the Transport Department, and the Traffic Police to submit their replies by May 29. This judicial intervention highlights the growing concerns about urban mobility and infrastructure in Chennai.
The PIL contends that the absence of proper barricades at metro work sites poses severe risks to pedestrians, turning their daily commute into a hazardous ordeal. The lack of adequate bus shelters, coupled with makeshift alternatives, further exacerbates the inconvenience faced by the city’s commuters. Highlighting the fundamental right to safe walking, the petitioner calls for immediate action to ensure the provision of suitable bus shelters and footpaths.
This issue underscores a broader urban planning challenge, where rapid infrastructure development often overlooks the needs of everyday commuters. The court’s directive aims to balance the city’s modernisation efforts with the necessity of maintaining essential public amenities.
In a parallel case, the Delhi High Court has converted a public interest litigation into a revision plea against a trial court judgment under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act. The division bench noted ‘manifest illegalities’ in the trial court’s dismissal of a case involving two men accused of child pornography. Emphasising the need for a thorough examination of evidence and adherence to legal definitions, the court has scheduled the next hearing for May 21, ensuring that justice is duly served.
These judicial actions reflect a broader trend of courts stepping in to rectify administrative oversights and protect public interest, reinforcing the judiciary’s role as a guardian of civil rights and public welfare.
