Delhi HC Demands Resident Survey Before Okhla Slum Demolition
The Delhi High Court has called for a crucial resident survey before proceeding with the demolition of the Okhla Dhobi Ghat slum, emphasizing the need to identify legitimate dwellers for rehabilitation or compensation. The ruling comes amid ongoing protests from residents and environmental groups, who are divided on the proposed redevelopment of the area.
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) intends to clear the land for a biodiversity park as part of its broader efforts to protect the floodplain of the Yamuna River. However, the slum dwellers argue that their eviction would cause severe social and economic hardship, as they claim they have lived in the area for many years. Environmental advocates, on the other hand, support the DDA’s plan, citing the importance of preserving the river basin’s fragile ecosystem.
The court, in its recent judgment, stressed the importance of conducting a thorough survey to determine which residents are eligible for compensation or rehabilitation. It pointed out that the survey is essential to ensure fairness and transparency before any demolition takes place. The court also emphasized that without this verification, it would be challenging to ensure that the rights of the residents were protected, particularly concerning the cut-off date for rehabilitation eligibility.
The DDA has maintained that the area is not officially listed for rehabilitation under the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB), and thus, the residents are not entitled to relocation benefits. However, the court urged that the issue be thoroughly examined, taking into account the vulnerability of the displaced families.
This case highlights the growing conflict between urban development projects and the rights of marginalized communities, especially in ecologically sensitive areas. Similar disputes have arisen in other cities like Mumbai and Chennai, where environmental goals often clash with the need for affordable housing for the urban poor. The court’s decision aims to ensure a fair process, balancing both ecological concerns and the welfare of displaced residents.
