Mumbai civic body razes illegal structure at The Habitat after political row
Mumbai, India – The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) on Monday initiated the demolition of unauthorised structures at The Habitat Studio in Khar, following a political controversy that erupted over a video by comedian Kunal Kamra. The civic body’s swift action came less than 24 hours after Shiv Sena workers vandalised the studio over alleged remarks made against Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde. The move has once again ignited debates over the selective enforcement of civic regulations and the influence of political pressures on urban governance.
The BMC’s inspection revealed structural violations, including a makeshift shed erected on the terrace and the unauthorised use of the basement as a studio, which was originally designated for storage. Officials from the H Ward carried out the demolition, citing municipal regulations that prohibit such modifications without prior approval. “The shed was an illegal addition, and the basement usage was a clear violation of building norms. We have acted as per the law,” said Assistant Municipal Commissioner Vinayak Vispute. He added that no prior notice was issued since temporary structures are removed immediately under civic policies.
The chain of events unfolded rapidly after state transport minister Pratap Sarnaik reportedly intervened, urging BMC Commissioner Bhushan Gagrani to take action against the club. Political tensions escalated as party workers stormed the venue, prompting the deployment of police personnel, including the State Reserve Police Force, to maintain order. The civic action, perceived by some as a response to political pressure rather than routine enforcement, has led to discussions on the broader issue of urban policy enforcement and the intersection of politics with regulatory oversight.
The controversy underscores a long-standing issue in Mumbai—unregulated commercial modifications that often escape scrutiny until political or public outcry forces intervention. While BMC continues to assert that the demolition was purely a legal measure, critics argue that similar violations in other parts of the city remain unaddressed. The case highlights the urgent need for transparent and consistent urban regulation, ensuring that enforcement actions are not swayed by political considerations but are instead rooted in sustainable urban planning and equitable governance.
