Mumbai’s municipal administration has escalated enforcement against chronic property tax non-payment, publishing a fresh list of major defaulters with outstanding dues totalling ₹96 crore. The move signals a tougher stance on revenue recovery as the city grapples with rising infrastructure costs, climate adaptation needs and pressure on civic services across a rapidly growing urban footprint.
The second list, released this week, includes residential, commercial and industrial properties spread across multiple municipal wards. Civic officials indicated that owners who fail to clear arrears within the stipulated timeframe will face attachment of assets, followed by auction proceedings if dues remain unpaid. The action forms part of a broader compliance drive aimed at strengthening the city’s financial base without increasing the tax burden on compliant citizens. Property tax remains the single largest source of recurring revenue for Mumbai’s civic body, funding essential services such as road maintenance, drainage upgrades, solid waste management and public health infrastructure. However, officials acknowledge that long-pending arrears have significantly constrained fiscal planning. Cumulative unpaid property tax dues, including penalties accumulated over more than a decade, are estimated to run into tens of thousands of crores, limiting the municipality’s ability to invest proactively in resilience and service quality.
According to senior officials familiar with the recovery process, repeated notices and follow-ups were issued before the publication of the defaulters’ list. The current phase of enforcement prioritises high-value defaults involving large plots, commercial buildings, mixed-use complexes and industrial premises. Urban finance experts note that targeting significant arrears can yield faster revenue gains while also sending a strong signal on governance credibility. The renewed push also has implications for Mumbai’s real estate ecosystem. Industry analysts say consistent tax enforcement improves market transparency and levels the playing field between compliant developers, businesses and property owners and those who delay or evade statutory payments. Over time, predictable enforcement is seen as critical for attracting responsible investment, particularly as the city undertakes capital-intensive projects linked to transport expansion, flood mitigation and low-carbon infrastructure.
From a civic perspective, officials argue that stronger collections reduce reliance on one-time grants or borrowing, enabling more stable funding for long-term urban priorities. These include climate-resilient stormwater systems, pedestrian infrastructure and upgrades to ageing civic assets—areas where underinvestment can disproportionately affect vulnerable communities. The municipal administration has indicated that further lists may follow if compliance does not improve. For property owners, the message is clear: delayed payment now carries a tangible risk of asset attachment. For the city, the effectiveness of this drive will be measured not only by revenue recovered, but by whether it translates into more reliable, equitable and future-ready urban services.
BMC Warns Property Auctions Over Unpaid City Taxes
