A long-delayed slum redevelopment project in Mumbai’s Borivali suburb has come under sharp judicial scrutiny, with the Bombay High Court intervening to halt a state-backed move to appoint a new developer. The court’s observations raise serious questions about governance, accountability and the protection of vulnerable communities within Maharashtra’s slum rehabilitation framework.
The case concerns a slum rehabilitation scheme in Borivali East that has remained stalled for nearly two decades, leaving residents in precarious living conditions despite repeated assurances of redevelopment. During a recent hearing, the High Court stayed a March 2024 decision of the state housing department that sought to approve a new developer for the project, citing apparent violations of earlier judicial directions. At the centre of the dispute is a prolonged failure to execute redevelopment commitments under the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) mechanism. According to submissions before the court, the original developer appointed in the early 2000s did not commence construction for several years, prompting residents’ associations to seek intervention through statutory grievance redressal channels. These proceedings had earlier cleared the way for the society to change developers, a decision that was subsequently challenged in multiple legal forums.
Urban policy experts say the matter highlights a recurring problem in Mumbai’s slum redevelopment ecosystem, where overlapping jurisdictions, financial entanglements and weak enforcement often delay delivery of housing to eligible residents. In this case, the court noted that despite clear directions from constitutional courts to maintain status quo, administrative approvals were granted that effectively altered the project’s trajectory. The High Court also took note of the land ownership pattern, observing that the redevelopment site is located on public land under the municipal corporation’s control. This, the bench indicated, places an added responsibility on civic and state authorities to safeguard public interest and ensure that redevelopment decisions adhere strictly to statutory processes.
From an urban development perspective, the stalled Borivali project underscores the social cost of delayed housing delivery. Residents have continued to live in substandard conditions for years, even as land values in the surrounding area have risen sharply. Industry observers point out that such delays not only erode trust in redevelopment models but also distort local real estate markets and slow broader neighbourhood renewal. The court’s interim order staying the state’s approval is likely to have wider implications for other stalled slum schemes being considered for revival under recent policy initiatives. Legal experts suggest the ruling signals that administrative shortcuts, even when framed as revival measures, will face close judicial examination if they bypass due process or court mandates.
As the matter awaits final hearing later this month, attention will remain on whether authorities can reset the project within a transparent, lawful framework. For Mumbai’s slum rehabilitation programme to support inclusive, climate-resilient urban growth, experts argue that timely execution, institutional accountability and resident-centric planning must move from policy intent to on-ground delivery.
Mumbai Court Halts Contested Borivali Slum Redevelopment
