In 2025, Karnataka’s real estate regulator quietly but decisively reshaped the balance of power between developers, lenders, and homebuyers. Through a series of consequential rulings, the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (KRERA) reinforced buyer protections, clarified promoter obligations, and expanded the practical reach of the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, setting new compliance benchmarks for the state’s property sector.
One of the year’s most impactful orders involved a Bengaluru housing project where buyers faced the threat of losing homes already purchased and registered. KRERA intervened to prevent a lender from taking possession of sold apartments after the developer defaulted on its loans. The Authority held that purchasers who had entered into agreements in good faith could not be penalised for undisclosed mortgages created by the promoter. Industry experts say the ruling reaffirmed a core RERA principle: financial disputes between developers and lenders cannot override consumer rights once a sale is complete. Equally significant was KRERA’s use of its powers under Section 8 of the Act to revive a stalled housing project in Belagavi. After the developer’s death left construction incomplete and buyers stranded, the regulator allowed the residents’ association to step in and complete the project under regulatory supervision. Officials described the decision as an exceptional but necessary intervention to protect buyers paying EMIs without possession. Urban planners note that such orders offer a practical pathway to resolve distress while preventing partially built sites from becoming long-term urban scars.
Delay compensation also featured prominently in KRERA’s 2025 orders. In one case involving a high-rise luxury project in Bengaluru, the Authority directed a developer to pay over Rs 1 crore in interest to a buyer after years of missed possession deadlines. The regulator rejected arguments citing extensions and disruptions, noting that timelines cannot be altered unilaterally. The ruling reinforced contractual certainty, even in premium housing segments, and sent a clear signal that size or stature of a project does not dilute accountability. KRERA also took a firm view on misuse of common assets and land rights. In another Bengaluru project, the Authority pulled up a developer for attempting to reassign undivided land shares promised to existing buyers, while failing to deliver basic infrastructure such as boundary walls. Legal observers say the decision underscored the regulator’s growing scrutiny of how shared spaces and land entitlements are handled within phased developments.
Collectively, these rulings reflect a maturing regulatory ecosystem one that prioritises transparency, financial discipline, and long-term urban stability. As Karnataka continues to urbanise rapidly, such regulatory clarity is increasingly seen as essential to building inclusive, resilient, and sustainable cities where trust underpins growth rather than speculation.
Also Read: Mumbai High Court Rejects Probe Plea Into Worli Palais Royale Luxury Project
