A portion of the 600-metre seawall constructed by the Maharashtra Maritime Board (MMB) at Aksa Beach in Mumbai has begun to collapse under pressure from tidal waters, triggering outcry from environmental advocates.
The seawall, intended by MMB to combat coastal erosion, has faced vehement opposition from groups such as NatConnect Foundation, who argue that the structure disrupts natural tidal flows and violates Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) guidelines. Zoru Bathena, director at NatConnect Foundation, highlighted these concerns in a plea to the National Green Tribunal (NGT), challenging the legality of the construction.The Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEFCC) has taken note of the controversy, directing MCZMA to investigate and submit findings on the seawall’s compliance with environmental regulations.
According to reports, MMB proceeded with the project despite ongoing deliberations at the NGT’s western zonal bench, seeking amendments to CRZ conditions that initially restricted solid constructions in CRZ-1 areas, where tidal influence is significant. The Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) controversially granted permission for the seawall’s completion, citing concerns over erosion affecting nearby electric poles. MMB’s advocate, Saket Mane, acknowledged procedural lapses but defended the necessity of anti-erosion measures, arguing their alignment with CRZ notifications.
NatConnect’s scrutiny extended to local authorities, including the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), which faced inquiries under the Right to Information (RTI) Act regarding claims of erosion near electric poles—an issue contested by environmentalists since the project’s inception. Environmental activist Zoru Bathena cautioned against disregarding ecological impacts, emphasizing that opposition to the seawall has persisted since its construction commenced over two years ago. “Today’s incident serves as a stark reminder of the perils of tampering with natural coastal dynamics,” Bathena remarked, underscoring the broader implications of human intervention on sensitive coastal ecosystems.
