Across India’s largest employment hubs, an increasing number of affluent professionals are choosing high-end rentals over purchasing multi-crore homes a shift that signals changing attitudes toward wealth, mobility and urban living.In cities such as Bengaluru, Mumbai and Delhi, monthly rents between Rs 60,000 and Rs 1 lakh are becoming common for premium apartments in central business districts and well-connected residential enclaves.
Yet, rather than viewing these payments as a stepping stone to ownership, many high-income tenants are consciously opting to remain renters even when they have the financial capacity to buy homes priced between Rs 3 crore and Rs 5 crore. Property consultants and wealth advisers say the decision is rooted in arithmetic as much as aspiration. Rental yields in prime micro-markets often hover around 2-4 per cent annually. That means a property commanding ₹60,000 per month in rent may carry a valuation upwards of Rs 2-3 crore. Servicing a mortgage on such assets, particularly at prevailing interest rates, can translate into significantly higher equated monthly instalments (EMIs) than rent outgo. Beyond cost comparisons, lifestyle considerations are shaping the calculus. High-earning professionals working in technology, finance and consulting sectors increasingly value proximity to workplaces and transit nodes. In dense cities like Mumbai, eliminating long daily commutes can materially improve work-life balance. Renting enables access to prime neighbourhoods that may otherwise require disproportionate capital commitments. Mobility is another decisive factor. India’s knowledge economy has become geographically fluid, with opportunities shifting across cities and even international markets. A long-term home loan can tether households to a single location for decades. Renting, by contrast, offers flexibility to relocate quickly in response to career shifts, global assignments or entrepreneurial ventures.
Taxation also plays a role. Under the old income tax regime, tenants may claim House Rent Allowance benefits, while homeowners can deduct certain loan repayments and interest components. However, financial planners caution that tax advantages rarely offset the full financial and opportunity cost of locking substantial capital into real estate especially when alternative investments may yield higher returns. Urban economists note that this trend reflects a broader transformation in India’s housing narrative. Homeownership remains culturally significant, yet for a segment of the urban middle and upper-middle class, housing is increasingly treated as a consumption choice rather than a compulsory wealth anchor. The preference for renting aligns with evolving ideas of asset-light living, diversified investments and professional agility. For cities, the implications are nuanced. A stable, premium rental market can support efficient land use, reduce speculative vacancies and encourage professionally managed housing stock. At the same time, policymakers must ensure rental frameworks remain transparent and balanced, protecting both tenants and landlords.
As India’s metropolitan regions expand and densify, the decision to rent rather than buy is becoming less about affordability constraints and more about strategic choice reflecting a maturing urban economy where flexibility and liquidity carry growing weight alongside the aspiration to own.
Also Read:Â Pune housing costs reshape HRA exemption rules
Bengaluru professionals rethink luxury homeownership
